THE
DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY
By
Jacqueline Monahan
Jacqueline
Monahan is an English tutor for the GEAR UP program at
UNLV. She is also a consultant for Columbia College
Chicago in Adjunct Faculty Affairs.
jaxn8r@msn.com




Imagine one moment that you are driving along the French countryside in your
new sports car with your son. You’re in your early forties, divorced, in a
hotshot career; a jet-setting, good-looking man with the world at your feet.
The next thing you remember, and this is how the film opens, is waking up in
a hospital room, a slow realization that something is terribly wrong.
Doctors speak to you and you think you’re answering them, only to realize
that you can’t speak, the words are in your head. You are completely
immobile and have suffered a massive stroke affecting your brain stem. A
no-nonsense doctor tells you that you have what’s called “locked-in”
syndrome. Your mind is sharp, your body useless except for your left eyelid,
which can blink.
Your right eye is paralyzed and the socket droops in perpetual openness. Not
that there’s anything you want to see. You must watch this eye be sewn shut,
even if that is not your wish. While your mind screams, “No!” the needle
persists in its grim task.

The camera is in your
head. And when you blink, the viewer sees it. When your eyes well up with
tears, they perceive the blur, unexplained until someone speaks. But not
you; you can’t.
Women flood the room like angels, each with a saving grace to bestow. One is
your physical therapist Henriette, (Marie-Josee Croze) one is your speech
therapist, Marie, (Olatz Lopez Garmendia), one is your ex-wife and mother of
your children Celine, (Emanuelle Siegner), and one is your current lover
Ines (Marina Hinds), who cannot bring herself to come, but her memory
sustains you in particularly bleak times.
Jean-Dominique Bauby’s 1997 memoir of the same name details his journey from
able-bodied young man to utterly dependent organism with less self
determination than a newborn, who could at least signal distress. Known as
Jean-Do (Mathieu Amalric) he is the editor of French Elle, a paragon of
superficial beauty and shallow, materialistic values.

Jean-Do makes up in
recollection what he lacks in movement. We can always hear his thoughts and
see his memories, whether it’s shaving his elderly father, Papineau (Max Von
Sydow) or visiting Lourdes in perfect health, with Ines.
He ruminates about his looks, then and now. We don’t get to see his full
face for nearly an hour and we recoil a bit at the transformation.
Recollecting a series of stills of a very beautiful Marlon Brando as an
example of facial grace, Jean-Do interrupts his thoughts to say, “But this
is not me.” Cut to a scene of a lone skier on a high downhill slope,
completely free and practically flying, and Jean-Do’s thought-words
continue: “THIS is me.” The poignancy of this scene made me feel like I
could not form words.
Jean-Do’s life is now like one long alert dream. Frustrated and somewhat
terrified, he signals to his speech therapist Marie that he wishes for death
in the only way he can: by blinking with his left eyelid as she reads him
the alphabet, (a special one, by order of usage). She tells him of her
disappointment, as if he let her down. We feel Jean-Do’s despair and rage
ruminations and regrets. We are inside his head, behind his eyes, powerful
in all of his helplessness.

We understand where he
is driving us in his body that will not move, will not obey except to gape
at him in monstrous distortion. Recollections are almost too cruel to
summon. Attempts at normal interaction, a day with Celine and his three
children at the beach have almost the opposite affect, highlighting the
changed Jean-Do more than incorporating him.
He likens his condition to being trapped in a diving bell, that helmet-like
contraption which was a precursor of modern scuba gear. One is weighted and
has no movement, held still by outfit and surroundings. Conversely, the
butterfly is the epitome of freedom; speed, flight, and fickle movement on a
caprice – galaxies away from Jean-Do’s current state.

Writing a book becomes
his passion, using one eyelid and the help of another woman, transcriber
Claude, (Anne Consigny) taking down each individual letter, making words,
sentences, paragraphs and pages of thoughts and memories. Two days after
publication, Jean-Do dies and we don’t mourn, knowing that he’s found a type
of freedom once more.
Mathieu Amalric is profoundly effective (and affecting) as the stricken
editor. His performance is one of the truly haunting and heartbreaking
portrayals of determination and even wry humor in the face of life-altering
circumstances.
Director Julian Schnabel won Best Director at Cannes and learned French for
this project. He and Director of Photography Janusz Kaminski (Schindler’s
List) take you literally inside Jean-Do’s head. The viewer is able to feel
his frustration, anger, poignant recollections and ironic ruminations. A
harmless fly becomes an abominable trespasser when he cannot remove it from
his face. We are made to feel it on ours.

Academy-Award winning
Director of Photography Janusz Kaminski (Schindler’s list) is one of the
most famous alumni from my alma mater, Columbia College Chicago. He arrived
in Chicago from Poland, knowing only enough English to order breakfast. Here
he shows us his ability to illuminate our consciousness through Jean-Do’s
eyes and his own skillful lens.
Excruciating, harrowing, moving, and insightful, there are some parts that
may be too intense for the squeamish to watch. Do yourself a favor and try.
I know I was grateful for the opportunity as well as the ability to move and
be moved by one man who lost that ability himself.
In French with subtitles.



