“2006
NAB” FEATURES INFORMATIVE SESSIONS WITH OSCAR WINNING FILMMAKERS
By Judy Thorburn
Photos by Stephen Thorburn
Besides the convention floor where more than 1,400 exhibitors show the
latest in television, radio, post/production and multimedia
technologies, the world’s largest electronic media show known as NAB
(National Association of Broadcasters) is broken down into various
conferences, and offer a wide range of educational sessions, award
luncheons, and receptions.

But, for the attendees who
work or aspire to work behind the camera in the movie industry, one of
the highlights of the 2006 edition of NAB that took place at the Las
Vegas Hilton and the Las Vegas Convention Center on April 22-27 had to
be the keynote dialogue sessions with a few of Hollywood’s top
filmmakers. As part of the NAB Post Production World Conference, one
session had Academy Award winning editor Hughes Winborne, as the
featured speaker who just this past March won an Oscar for his amazing
work on Best Picture of 2005, Crash. Winborne spoke about his roots in
the south where he spent his early years as a paralegal and house
painter before deciding that he loved movies so much that he wanted to
change directions and work in films. Everyone he met in the industry
wanted to be a director, but he knew he wanted to be an editor. His
first job was low budget films Girl From India and The Mutilator. But
while “most move up through assistant work. I didn’t do it that way”, he
said. “My experience was unconventional. Sling Blade was the job that
allowed me to move into feature films. It was the beginning of my work
in Indie Films. I was completely committed and passionate about those
projects. But, it is tough in the independent (film) world; so hard to
get them into theatres.” Winborne said that his resume includes lots of
independent films we never heard of and working in TV on 48 Hours at
CBS, which he said was “great training.” He went in to say. “I feel
incredibly lucky to do what I do. I have a fun job. Once I found out
what I wanted to do, I stuck with it even after people suggested that I
give it up. The editing room is a fun place.”
  
 
He brought along a few
clips from some of his work, the first shown being the opening sequence
of 2001’s Stark Raving Mad, a film that he was asked to create a
“visual” equivalent of technomusic, a challenge if there ever was one.
With a one year old to support, he thought once again about changing
careers when he landed Crash and felt (the film) had to “stand out in an
extraordinary way.” Winborne showed clips from the film and spoke about
the editing techniques he used to create a certain kind of impact and
how the use of the glare of bright Christmas lights on LA streets while
filming in December delivered a very special effect. Another scene was
so emotionally intense that when it came into the editing room it made
him weep, something that he warned would happened again, and it did. As
a complex film with multi storylines, Winborne said Crash was not easy
to edit, and gave an example of a very tense scene with actor Michael
Pena, that had “no wasted moments.” Regarding working with writers and
directors and their input, he said that Paul Haggis (Crash’s director)
was incredibly committed to the project, and there was not a frame he
didn’t look at.”
  
Winborne introduced his
assistant editor, John Breinholt, who has been working with him for
seven years since meeting Winborne in Salt Lake City where he was making
a film. It was obvious the editor and his protégé have a mutual respect
and admiration for each other and shared their feelings about their
craft, and insight on what’s it is like working together and with
directors on feature films. “Assistants do what he can’t do. I am not
analytical. John is,” Winborne said. “He helps me a lot and it is
helpful for the director. Part of an editor’s job is being the shrink
between director and producer.” Breinholt said that after graduating
from the University of Utah’s film program, he looked at editing and
found it attractive. “I would be on the job from beginning of the film
to the end. It doesn’t matter how big a film. It comes down to a couple
of people in a room. What I get out of a film is creative. It is
important to have an opinion in the cutting room; a point of view, the
start of how I get involved creatively.” I am sure the audience left
with some insightful information they could use in their own creative
endeavors.

Part of NAB’s Digital
Cinema Summit was an interesting keynote dialogue titled “Where is
Digital Cinema and How Do we Get There?” led by moderator Charles Koones
of Variety that had James Cameron, the Oscar winning filmmaker/director
of Titanic, and NATO (National Association of Theatre Owners) President
John Fithian speaking about Digital Cinema and its relation to enhancing
the movie going experience. “There is a growing malaise about going to
the theatre with HD rolling out in homes. We are going to lose audiences
if we don’t fight to keep them,” Cameron said.

Fithian added, “We
constantly have to improve the movie going experience. Business wise,
Dolby surround sound was very important, but digital cinema is a bigger
change than digital sound. Digital technology is the biggest transition
since sound. It is ready now and will improve the experience with a high
quality of what you see on screen and enables something really cool.”
 
Cameron said that he
started shooting digitally in 2000 and that “the person who wants to see
a big epic will differentiate between 35mm and digital cinema.”
Fithian addressed the marketing potential for digital cinema. “Movie
screens are a whole lot bigger than home screens for one. Digital is a
real improvement that can be marketed rather than film. Visually it is
better and audiences are more excited.”
While top filmmakers Spielberg and M. Night Shyamalan said back in 2002
they would not shoot in digital, Cameron noted “They are artists, doing
things the way THEY want.” On the idea about transferring large-scale
films to cell phone screens, Cameron responded with a laugh. “Who would
want to watch Star Wars, Titanic or 2001 on a cell phone?”
  
In regards to fighting
piracy, a major problem for the industry, as NATO President, Fithian
said, “If we continue to do digital cinema right, it will help fight
piracy. The digital age will enable us to jam camcorders. Content is
encrypted and sent separate from key codes, making the delivery more
secure.”

“The more technology you
have, the more you can do,” said Cameron. “Each era of film has its own
flavor and style.” But, when asked how digital cinema will affect the
style of films being made today and in the future, Cameron replied, “The
important things that make good cinema don’t change. You still need a
good script, acting, and content. The new tools enhance the ability of a
filmmaker to do these things, as long as filmmakers don’t overuse a
technique.”
When it comes to the influence of digital cinema technologies, you can
bet the theatre going experience is now being transformed to a new level
of entertainment for all to appreciate and enjoy. This year, NAB showed
all of us that what is being created and implemented is just the tip of
the iceberg in what awaits the consumer.
|