CLOVERFIELD
By
Shannon Onstot
Community Relations Manager
KUNV 91.5 FM
University of Nevada Las Vegas
email:
smonstot@yahoo.com





Do not, under any circumstances, watch this film if you're prone to motion
sickness. Thank goodness I sat in the back row of the theater... any closer
and I may have had to start wearing glasses permanently. The headache and
tired eyes after this film were worth it though, Cloverfield is a great
film, even if I don't think it's quite as groundbreaking as JJ Abrams'
biggest fans do.

Cloverfield is about a group of friends who
are trying to survive an attack on Manhattan by a crazy mystery monster. The
entire film is shown under the premise that a personal videotape has been
found after the attack by The Department of Defense so the tape is being
shown in its entirety without an added soundtrack, editing or added effects.
The overall look of the film is very natural (if not a little nauseating)
and it really does give the impression that you are right in the thick of
the events on screen. The lack of soundtrack coupled with mostly no-name
actors and actresses made the plot much more believable to a certain extent.

This film is surrounded with hype, and
most of it is created by those who can't live without watching Lost every
week. Cloverfield is produced by JJ Abrams and written by Drew Goddard (also
of Lost fame). The secrecy surrounding the film's plot and especially its
monster made watching the film more of an experience than it would have been
if more were given away beforehand. Because everyone has walked into the
film blind, the cheesiness seems a lot less... well... cheesy, and the
hoopla made audiences (myself included) that Cloverfield is basically a
direct ripoff of The Blair With Project with a much better budget and
grander special effects.
Now, I don't think this movie breaks any kind of new ground, and without
giving too much away about the film's crazy monster or different format, I
do think it has quite a few interesting messages about today's culture and
how it deals with emergencies. For example, I found it very interesting that
many bystanders and extras in the films (as well as a few of its main
characters) were more concerned with capturing footage on their camera
phones and video cameras than actually helping people who had been hurt or
were scared. A lot of times electronics really became a sort of security
blanket and shield for people and the camcorder/Youtube style format of the
film itself is really telling of how huge a role our personal devices really
play in our lives.

Now, like I said, I don't think the
film's different format really breaks any new ground or does anything
entirely original, but it is a great modernization of some very original
things that have been done before. The characters were human and not over
the top, their struggles were believable considering the plot, and there
were a lot of great scares that made that slight seasick feeling that hit me
during the credits much more bearable.



